Guidelines adopted by the Board of Trustees in 1997 state that the Resources Committee should determine if campus consensus is possible on issues regarding the University’s investments before recommending the issue be examined further. The council includes the Resources Committee, which considers concerns about the University’s endowment, including those that garner “considerable, thoughtful and sustained campus interest.” The CPUC is composed of students, faculty, staff, and alumni representatives and meets six times per year. “His insistence on ‘consensus’ needed to bring the issue of divestment to the table is a disingenuous reading of CPUC’s charter,” PIAD added. In a written statement to The Daily Princetonian, PIAD said that Eisgruber’s “refusal to take measures to either discern student opinion or act based on a widespread international moral consensus is taking a stance on this ‘contentious’ issue.” Other students were present at the meeting in opposition to the petition, some wearing shirts reading“Princeton stands with Israel.” What it can do best is to sponsor the teaching and research that make a difference and that we are uniquely qualified to do.”ĭuring the meeting, nearly 30 students with the Princeton Israeli Apartheid Divest Coalition (PIAD), the group spearheading the petition, intermittently and silently held up signs with a green thumbs up or a red thumbs down in response to questions from the student body and Eisgruber’s answers. “What can do best is not taking stands on contested issues. “At the end of the day, when you’re investing, one person is selling an investment, another person is buying the investment,” he said. Eisgruber also took issue with “divestment as a solution,” he said, in a response to another question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |